<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Value Line Observer Report &#187; HI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://valuelineobserver.thevalueguys.com/index.php/tag/hi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://valuelineobserver.thevalueguys.com</link>
	<description>with Val Hughes of the Value Guys!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 04:23:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Value Line Observer – Jan 22, 2010: CHE, VMI, HI</title>
		<link>http://valuelineobserver.thevalueguys.com/2010/01/23/value-line-observer-%e2%80%93-jan-22-2010-che-vmi-hi/</link>
		<comments>http://valuelineobserver.thevalueguys.com/2010/01/23/value-line-observer-%e2%80%93-jan-22-2010-che-vmi-hi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 02:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CHE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valuelineobserver.thevalueguys.com/?p=31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
This is a summary of this week’s show.   Listen in at  Value Line Observer &#8211; January 22 2010
Note:  This Blog is for Entertainment Purposes Only and should not be  relied on.  See all our disclosures at www.thevalueguys.com.

Val&#8217;s Three Best Ideas This Week:
Chemed Corp (CHE)
I rambled on a little bit about this one on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- 		@page { margin: 0.79in } 		P { margin-bottom: 0.08in } --></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">This is a summary of this week’s show.   Listen in at  <a href="http://www.thevalueguys.com/podcast/vlo_1-22-09.mp3">Value Line Observer &#8211; January 22 2010</a><br />
Note:  This Blog is for Entertainment Purposes Only and should not be  relied on.  See all our disclosures at www.thevalueguys.com.</p>
<p><!-- 		@page { margin: 0.79in } 		P { margin-bottom: 0.08in } --></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">Val&#8217;s Three Best Ideas This Week:</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">Chemed Corp (CHE)</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">I rambled on a little bit about this one on the show, so you are definitely saving time by reading this.  I&#8217;m attracted to the valuation at 14x earnings and 7x EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest Taxes Depreciation and Amortization). But it&#8217;s not just that.  The company has two businesses: Roto-Rooter, which is, according to Value Line, the largest plumbing company in the U.S, and VITAS Healthcare, a hospice business.  What I like about this is that as among the largest competitors in stable commodity markets, these companies should be able to keep their competitive edge by simply maintaining it&#8217;s share of mind with consumers.  They will have economies of scale in advertising because of size, will be in a position to do accretive acquisitions with private competitors, and are unlikely to be out flanked by new technology or a new entrant.  So, at 7x EBITDA, you have a 14% (1/7) earnings yield plus growth, which Value Line estimates at 9%, but I only need 5% to make it a buy in my book.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">Valmont Industries (VMI)</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">I&#8217;ve watched this company for over 25 years, and i&#8217;m actually surprised it hasn&#8217;t been bought out.  It&#8217;s a leading provider in the agriculture irrigation business, and it has leveraged that manufacturing skill into a pole business for the electric grid, cell phone tower business, lighting and traffic, and maybe even the plain old telephone pole business, although i&#8217;m not sure about that last one.  I&#8217;m attracted initially to the low valuation, at 8x EBITDA and a 20% discount to the market P/E, it deserves a second look.  They have been improving return on capital for several years, which means something incremental is going on that&#8217;s generating outstanding marginal returns on capital.  The return on equity has moved over 20%,</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">and while the stock is off the lows, it seems cheap for a best of class provider in a core world market, with clear advantages in several growth markets.  The balance sheet is in great shape, and insider ownership is meaningful.  Not a great dividend yield, but at least lately, management has had a good use for the money.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">Hillenbrand (HI)</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">This is the casket business, which was formed as  spin out from the old Hillenbrand, which also owned a hospital bed business, Hill Rom.  For some reason, Value Line doesn&#8217;t even rate this, maybe because it&#8217;s less than 2 years old, although the former Hillenbrand was a public company for many years. What I&#8217;m attracted to is, like the Chemed story, a stable, low risk, business, that offers an earnings yield significantly above bonds of like risk.  Hillenbrand trades at an enterprise value of $1.2 billion, the price we&#8217;d have to pay to own all the stock and debt, less the cash.  We can look at the ebitda divided by the enterprise value as a yield I often refer to as cash on cash yield – the cash we get divided by the cash we pay – and we can reasonably compare this to a bond yield of like risk as a benchmark for relative valuation.  In the case of Hillenbrand, with $200 million in ebitda, I have a 16.6% cash on cash yield plus, admittedly, tiny growth.  Not only is the death rate even lower than population growth, but you have cremations taking share from caskets, so it&#8217;s not great.  But with a 16.6% cash on cash yield, I don&#8217;t need a lot of growth to be attractive, and this seems pretty low risk.  With a strong brand and economies of scale in manufacturing and distribution – not to mention their state of the art training center for funeral home directors – in an industry that is pretty much unchanged for a thousand years, unseating their leadership position would be a daunting task.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://valuelineobserver.thevalueguys.com/2010/01/23/value-line-observer-%e2%80%93-jan-22-2010-che-vmi-hi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.285 seconds -->

